I. Start the exam by click the “Start” button
Biostatistics
II. Preview all questions below
1.You note that in your practice, a large number of women with a fam- ily history of breast cancer in a first degree relative develop breast cancer You evaluate a number of charts, and find that 5% of the women in your practice who have breast cancer have a family history, but only 2% of women without breast cancer have a family history. Given this information, what is the sensitivity of using family history as a predictor of breast cancer in your patient population?
- 2%
- 5%
- 93%
- 95%
- 98%
2. You are reading a population study that reports 90% of people with lung cancer are Thirty percent of the people without lung cancer are also smokers. Given this information, what is the specificity using smoking as a predictor of lung cancer?
- 10%
- 30%
- 40%
- 70%
- 90%
3. You are determining whether or not to use a rapid streptococcal anti- gen test to screen for streptococcal You find that that 2% of people with strep throat actually test negative using this test. Of the fol- lowing, which statement best describes this situation?
- The sensitivity of the test is 2%
- The specificity of the test is 98%
- The test has a 2% false negative rate
- The test has a 2% false positive rate
- The test has a positive predictive value of 98%
4. You are reading a medical journal and come across an article about The study followed 10,000 patients over 3 years. At the start of the study, 2000 people had diabetes. At the end of the study, 1000 addi- tional people developed diabetes. What was the incidence of diabetes dur- ing the study?
- 10%
- 12.5%
- 20%
- 30%
- 50%
5. You are reading a study that compares cholesterol levels in children whose fathers died from a myocardial infarction with cholesterol levels in children whose fathers died from other The p value obtained in the test was <0.001. What does this value indicate?
- There was no difference in cholesterol levels between the two groups
- The difference in the cholesterol levels was less than 0.1%
- There is a less than 0.1% probability that the results obtained in this study were incorrect
- There is a less than 0.1% probability that the results obtained in this study occurred because of a sampling error
- If the null hypothesis is true, there is a less than 0.1% probability of obtaining a test statistic equal to or more extreme than the one obtained
6. You are considering using a new influenza screening You find a study that evaluated 1000 patients with this new test. Of these 1000 patients, 400 had the disease. 300 of those had positive tests, and 100 of those had a negative test. Of the 600 that did not have the disease, 200 had positive tests, and 400 had negative tests. What is the positive predictive value of this test?
- 50%
- 60%
- 66%
- 75%
- 80%
7. You find that many of your patients that have gone to the emergency department with chest pain have a negative set of initial cardiac Most of those with a negative set of initial enzymes did not have a heart attack. You decide to evaluate 100 of your patients who have gone to the emergency department with chest pain to find out if an initial set of nega- tive enzymes by itself is a good predictor of those that are not having a myocardial infarction (MI). Of those 100 patients, 20 of them had acute MIs. Of those 20, 10 had a positive set of enzymes initially. Of the 80 that did not have an acute MI, none of them had a positive set of initial enzymes. Given this information, what is the negative predictive value of the initial set of cardiac enzymes in your patient population?
- 20%
- 22%
- 50%
- 89%
- 100%